Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Showing Original Post only (View all)

sarisataka

(21,663 posts)
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 06:03 PM Sep 2015

Tug of war over children's lives [View all]

TELL DOJ: CANCEL $2.4 MILLION GRANT TO GUN LOBBY GROUP

Joint Petition from Newtown Action Alliance, Connecticut Against Gun Violence, and the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence:

On September 10, 2015, the Newtown, Connecticut-based National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) announced that it had been awarded a two-year, $2.4 million grant by the U.S. Department of Justice for its Project ChildSafe program.1 The funds will go toward buying kits (containing a cable-style gun lock and safety brochure) which NSSF distributes to law enforcement agencies around the country.2 Law enforcement typically provides these kits to gun owners at their request.

While few would oppose the use of gun locks to secure firearms or the dissemination of information on gun safety, the partnership between DOJ and NSSF is nonetheless deeply troubling. Since the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary—which claimed the lives of 20 children and 6 adults in NSSF’s own community—the organization has opposed any and all attempts to strengthen U.S. gun laws to prevent future tragedies. Instead, NSSF has actively lobbied for policies that put children at direct risk of obtaining unsecured firearms. Specifically, NSSF:

Opposes all legislation that would require parents to safely store firearms in the home in the manner described in their Project ChildSafe Safety Kit brochure.
Opposes Child Access Prevention laws to hold adults criminally responsible when children gain unauthorized access to their firearms.
Supports unprecedented legal immunity for the gun industry, which prevents parents (and others) from bringing lawsuits against the industry when they market and/or distribute their products in a negligent manner.
Supports lowering the age at which Americans can purchase firearms and carry them in public.
Furthermore, Project ChildSafe has been beset with problems from the start. After hundreds of thousands of its gun locks were recalled for being too fragile and flimsy, NSSF lost federal funding for the program in 2009. Obliged to fund Project ChildSafe on its own, NSSF scaled the program back significantly.3

It’s difficult to understand why the Obama administration would possibly want to bankroll a radical lobby that has accused it of being “willing to try virtually anything to pursue its gun control agenda in defiance of Congress and existing law.”4 Whatever good might be done by Project ChildSafe is vastly outweighed by the harm NSSF does in lobbying for reckless gun laws. No taxpayer in America should have to foot the bill for a profit-focused lobby looking to improve its public image.

Tell the Department of Justice: Cancel your $2.4 million grant to NSSF and find a better partner for gun violence prevention.
http://csgv.org/action/cancel-2-4-million-grant-gun-lobby/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=csgv&utm_content=2+-+Sign+our+petition+today+and+tell+the+Dep&utm_campaign=DOJNSSF&source=DOJNSSF
NSSF Statement: Project ChildSafe DOJ-OJP Cooperative Agreement Grant

The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), the trade association for the firearms, ammunition, hunting, and shooting sports industry, has been awarded a two-year $2.4 million competitive, cooperative agreement grant from the U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of Justice Programs (DOJ-OJP).

Following announcement of the award, two gun-control groups voiced opposition to the Department of Justice’s decision to select NSSF and Project ChildSafe to receive the grant. It is unfortunate that these groups, which do not have comprehensive, practical firearms safety programs of their own, cannot find common ground to support the goals of this successful, long-standing safety initiative.

They also made false claims about the quality of the program’s cable-style gun locks. The gun locks included in the Project ChildSafe firearm safety kits exceed standards set by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and the California Department of Justice.

The new federal funding will allow Project ChildSafe to expand its firearm safety efforts, broaden community partnerships and focus on developing new safety communication tools and distribution strategies.
http://www.nssfblog.com/nssf-statement-project-childsafe-doj-ojp-cooperative-agreement-grant/

Ultimate irony- "gun safety" groups are petitioning against a proven gun safety program. 37 million lock have been freely distributed over sixteen years, mostly through law enforcement. While CSGV and Newtown Action Alliance want the money to go to a program run by a 'better' group, they offer no suggestions. That is because there is no such program among the "gun safety" organizations. They focus 100% on lobbying for new laws while devoting no resources to education or providing the gun locks that they would like to see legally mandated.

It is especially ironic that the Newtown Action Alliance is against the program as had the rifle used at Sandy Hook been secured with a cable lock, the shooter would have been at least slowed, by having to locate the key, if not stopped entirely.

Whatever good might be done by Project ChildSafe...

The good is saving children's lives...
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tug of war over children's lives [View all] sarisataka Sep 2015 OP
Wanna save lives? I got a better idea, but it would require enforcing the randys1 Sep 2015 #1
You need to make up your mind sarisataka Sep 2015 #2
Obviously there is no chance we will enforce the 2nd randys1 Sep 2015 #5
So given the reality sarisataka Sep 2015 #7
I will make you a deal, federal funds to teach kids how not to shoot themselves, federal funds randys1 Sep 2015 #8
As part of a comprehensive sarisataka Sep 2015 #9
Why not now, why not give money to PP to assist? Have to overturn assholes law is all. randys1 Sep 2015 #10
Since PP is in place sarisataka Sep 2015 #12
Sounds OK to me. I have materially supported the RTCoose for decades. Eleanors38 Sep 2015 #15
Children injured while playing with guns were never part of any militia. branford Sep 2015 #3
I don't think you really understand the purpose of the Second Amendment TeddyR Sep 2015 #21
Wasn't there a gun control group that said it was going to distribute locks? petronius Sep 2015 #4
Even if some vehement gun control groups like Brady or MDA actually distributed gun locks, branford Sep 2015 #6
There was a website that Duckhunter935 Sep 2015 #11
You are thinking of sarisataka Sep 2015 #14
shows TOTAL GUN LOCKS: 18,681 Duckhunter935 Sep 2015 #22
Wow! 17000 in one day! sarisataka Sep 2015 #24
It will be down tomorrow Duckhunter935 Sep 2015 #25
You called it sarisataka Sep 2015 #26
randum number generator, lol Duckhunter935 Sep 2015 #29
Just another lamentable instance ... Straw Man Sep 2015 #13
The big problem is the controllers Don't want legitimacy given the "gun culture." Eleanors38 Sep 2015 #16
I doubt they see the parallel sarisataka Sep 2015 #17
Good comparison. Eleanors38 Sep 2015 #19
wasn't one of the grabbers just on here trying to claim that newtown clffrdjk Sep 2015 #18
Yes, but only if the right type of people get the money. n/t oneshooter Sep 2015 #20
would not surprise me they would be passing Duckhunter935 Sep 2015 #23
NSSF opposes Child Access Prev laws jimmy the one Sep 2015 #27
Are you referring to this sarisataka Sep 2015 #28
chinese junk locks jimmy the one Sep 2015 #30
They still gave away 2000X as many quality gun locks as the "gun safety" orgs did friendly_iconoclast Sep 2015 #31
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Tug of war over children'...»Reply #0