Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: I'm afraid. [View all]Straw Man
(6,911 posts)34. ... and there.
         I know you'll find any way possible to say gun violence has noting to do with guns, but it's nonsense. 
There you are again with the red herring. Obviously "gun violence" is impossible without guns, just as "knife violence" is impossible without knives and "potato violence" is impossible without potatoes. Overall violence as manifested in homicide rates is the issue, the one you're trying desperately to avoid.
I have a hard time though ACTUALLY thinking that you believe the US is a second world country, in any respects, as those are basically limited to Eastern Europe and poor countries in Asia. 
It depends on where you are in the US. Have you been to Detroit lately? A society that can't provide all its citizens with clean water is not a First World society in my book.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/special-features/2014/08/140822-detroit-michigan-water-shutoffs-great-lakes/
Then consider where the bulk of the murders are happening. What conclusions can you draw about the relationship between socioeconomic injustice and criminal violence?
I may have said murder rate, but I was obviously not quoting the murder rate... you can PRETEND I was lying about that, but I wasn't. You can believe it was an accident or not; your choice. 
And you can PRETEND you meant something you didn't say, but you can't hold me responsible for not divining your intention.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
  Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
						
							41 replies
							
								 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                     = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
        
        That's a good first option, I believe in the USMC rules for gun fighting...
        discntnt_irny_srcsm
        May 2016
        #7
      
        
        re: "would never call a non-gunner 'weak' or 'unprepared' or anything insulting."
        discntnt_irny_srcsm
        May 2016
        #18
      
  