Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)

14. I do when I run across deliberately vague allusions- but because you asked again:

Reply to HAB911 (Reply #11)

Thu Mar 2, 2017, 11:18 PM

Mar 2017

Someone would now have to actually pursue revocation in a court of law, with the allegedly incompetent person
able to challenge the proceedings, all while having the right to counsel- IOW, they couldn't be unilaterally stripped
of the right to possess firearms.

I could see how this would be problematic for those of a controlling mindset...

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

ACLU: the rule reinforced a stereotype that people with mental disabilities are violent [View all] discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2017 OP

They're right. n/t PoliticAverse Mar 2017 #1

If someone can't manage basic Phoenix61 Mar 2017 #2

I mean HAB911 Mar 2017 #3

In your opinion, are there any other legal restrictions they should be subject to? friendly_iconoclast Mar 2017 #7

Do you always answer a question with a question? HAB911 Mar 2017 #11

I do when I run across deliberately vague allusions- but because you asked again: friendly_iconoclast Mar 2017 #14

Should they be allowed to vote? n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2017 #4

I think your question will probably go unanswered, as will mine in post #7 friendly_iconoclast Mar 2017 #6

That sort?! HAB911 Mar 2017 #12

In point of fact, you *didn't* answer his question. friendly_iconoclast Mar 2017 #15

There are many reasons someone can't manage their affairs kudzu22 Mar 2017 #5

For SSI there are not a lot of reasons for a payee Phoenix61 Mar 2017 #8

Are there any other restrictions that you feel such persons ought to be subject to? friendly_iconoclast Mar 2017 #9

Sure, lots of things. Lock them up. yagotme Mar 2017 #17

Being bad at math should not result in felony-class penalties. benEzra Mar 2017 #16

I supported revoking the rule. TupperHappy Mar 2017 #10

I don't like the idea of stereotyping any group of people. Throck Mar 2017 #13