Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Race & Ethnicity

elleng

(139,346 posts)

13. #1 is a procedural mess of a case,

Reply to preventivePhD (Reply #12)

Sun Dec 16, 2012, 05:15 PM

Dec 2012

with Plaintiff (Plaintiff's counsel) appearing to make a bit of a mess in prosecuting the case. Courts gave her plenty of rope, and did not show prejudice on behalf of Defendant, imo. That's as far as I choose to go.

http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-8th-circuit/1577138.html

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Appeals Votes Down 30 race discrimination cases in a row [View all] preventivePhD Nov 2012 OP

You appear to assume they vote according to what you assume their appointer would want, elleng Nov 2012 #1

just curious preventivePhD Nov 2012 #2

I'm an attorney, elleng Nov 2012 #3

So there really no limit where you would become suspicious preventivePhD Nov 2012 #4

How do you know what law schools teach? elleng Nov 2012 #5

Since you didn't answer my question I'm not answering yours preventivePhD Nov 2012 #6

Your premise was flawed on 2 counts: elleng Nov 2012 #7

I guess you forgot logic was on the LSAT preventivePhD Nov 2012 #8

It's been quite a while since I took the LSAT. elleng Nov 2012 #9

You must be a genuis to take not have studied for LSAT logic exam preventivePhD Nov 2012 #10

As I said, been a LONG time, don't recall special LSAT logic exam, elleng Nov 2012 #11

I rarely agree with Republicans but I agree with Senator Grassley Analysis of Appeal court juges preventivePhD Dec 2012 #12

#1 is a procedural mess of a case, elleng Dec 2012 #13

The judges claim that ever single case they get is a procedural mess due to plaintiff's so preventivePhD Dec 2012 #14