Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience

Wilms

(26,795 posts)

9. No agenda on some of those.

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 08:33 PM

Mar 2016

The third link wouldn't even reference the allergy debate that's inconclusive.

With the CDC link, they state 60% of the reported illnesses are about raw milk. Fair to say that there is a lot LESS consumption of the stuff making that 60% an eye-popper. But we really don't know that the reporting on the pasteurized outbreaks is rigorous.

Did you ever have food poisoning and not call the CDC???

I have little doubt that the "safer" route is not raw. But why get in people's way if they want to drink the stuff. I'd agree a warning label would be in order...but a storm over it???

Do you realize there are cars on the road that lack air bags?? Do you?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Latest woo in some states... [View all] Archae Mar 2016 OP

"Some of those who got sick...did not drink the milk." Wilms Mar 2016 #1

They claim. Archae Mar 2016 #2

You shouldn't drink it. Wilms Mar 2016 #3

Ah, now you're promoting anit-public health stances? HuckleB Mar 2016 #4

Well gee Huck, Wilms Mar 2016 #5

Well, you could stop promoting anti-public health POVs. HuckleB Mar 2016 #6

Four words into it and "crank"? Wilms Mar 2016 #7

LOL! HuckleB Mar 2016 #8

No agenda on some of those. Wilms Mar 2016 #9

So, you think helmet laws are bad, too? HuckleB Mar 2016 #10

Call me a skeptic. Wilms Mar 2016 #11

You are no skeptic. HuckleB Mar 2016 #12

Have a nice evening, sir. n/t Wilms Mar 2016 #13

That's cute. You keep working to make the world a worse place. HuckleB Mar 2016 #14

Apparently the incident is now being investigated. progressoid Mar 2016 #15