Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

History of Feminism

In reply to the discussion: HoF thread [View all]

BainsBane

(56,559 posts)
5. Again, that assumes they see any of that as an issue
Tue Mar 17, 2015, 09:36 PM
Mar 2015

We had a thread with close to 100 recs insulting as a liar the prosecutor of an accused rapist, on the lam for four years. People insist that accused rapist has every right to evade justice, while to argue for principles of equality before the law or justice for rape victims makes one a "bootlicker." 100 recs for the accused rapist and against the prosecutor who dares to seek justice for his victims. That shows the extent of their regard for rape victims. They not only aren't concerned that the judicial system minimizes crimes against women, they become furious when a prosecutor seeks to hold accountable a man they think should be above the law, least of all for something as inconsequential as sexual assault against mere women.

Your mistake is in assuming any of what you express above matters at all. We have been shown time and time again that it does not.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

HoF thread [View all] mercuryblues Mar 2015 OP
you know. after the last week. all i saw. experienced. learned. and reading du today.... seabeyond Mar 2015 #1
No, I would vote to hide BainsBane Mar 2015 #2
"IF you want to change something" BainsBane Mar 2015 #3
Thanks mercuryblues Mar 2015 #4
Again, that assumes they see any of that as an issue BainsBane Mar 2015 #5
and who is this man they cheer? supposedly calling out those powerful, getting away with crime. seabeyond Mar 2015 #6
I don't care who he is BainsBane Mar 2015 #8
he was elevated, because supposedly he went after those men elevated, above the law. seabeyond Mar 2015 #9
I just read a defense of an ordinary rapist BainsBane Mar 2015 #10
ya. i saw that this morning. that is why i posted the first post in this thread. too many dismissal seabeyond Mar 2015 #11
And the person is still an active member BainsBane Mar 2015 #12
He was banned BainsBane Mar 2015 #14
well. yea. incredible. nt seabeyond Mar 2015 #15
meanwhile, another thread about Snowden BainsBane Mar 2015 #16
assange. and ya.... another one. yes. counting up all the rape apology, i hardly seabeyond Mar 2015 #17
btw... my lack of enthusiasm is not only with du, or even mostly with du. when we read seabeyond Mar 2015 #18
Notice that thread has to be turned into anything but a discussion of justice for rape victims BainsBane Mar 2015 #19
ya. now a days, it is just a matter of doing. cause it is inevitable they will do it and be allowed seabeyond Mar 2015 #20
I saw that post and I appreciated it. ismnotwasm Mar 2015 #7
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #13
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»HoF thread»Reply #5