James Carville debates David Hogg

[cadoman]

8. my anger w/Hogg completely dissipated when he informed me vice chairs had done this before

And Carville seemed a bit caught off guard by it too.

It is antithetical to the role, but maybe as was indicated in the interview: we've never had someone of Hogg's prominence in the role before, so the activity got more attention.

I do still think he should pick one role, regardless of the vice ch air history. He'd be a great vice chair, and he'd be great in recruiting new talent, but it's simply better for the party for the leadership positions to be neutral.

It is still gonna cause a ruckus when he eventually picks the Democratic seats his PAC Is going to challenge.