Sure looks like Garland blew it....

[bigtree]

69. there are no Garland apologists

...only Garland attackers who never come complete or correct with facts to support their attacks on Garland.

Just this 'Garland late' or 'Garland delayed' without a shred of proof those delays affected anything, not even bothering to explain, just the gaslighting, and the derision of anyone who takes the time to post facts of the case.

With the constant Garland bashers on the left, coupled with the constant Garland bashers on the right, it's no wonder the public impression of the people who were actual prosecuting Trump is so skewed against them, And it should be obvious in this internet propaganda age just how insidiously many work to divide our opposition.

But the zeal to blame the people actually doing the work of holding Trump accountable outstripped any effort to do more than play this 'Garland delayed shit' against each and every progress in the investigation, including the historic dual, multi-felony indictments..

No credit for that because of some clickbait report Carol Leonnig wrote, and now a book she wrote....

All of this supposing a WaPO clickbait reporter who's making money off of a clickbait book is more credible than the actual prosecutors of Trump.

It's just fucking stupid. No mature adult should be cowed by anyone claiming they're 'apologizing' for Garland by defending actual facts in the case, or explaining something beyond the misleading and ignorant claims that an internecine debate between FBI and DOJ, or an alleged 10 week delay in subpoenas materially affected ANYTHING in the prosecution.

Someone needs to apologize for elevating a clickbait WaPo reporter over the word and actions of the Biden DOJ.

Who the fuck is she, and what actual access was she supposed to have had to make these claims?

At the very least, the people who were prosecuting Trump, doing ALL the work, deserve to be heard from before making these specious judgments this reporter is inviting people to make, pretending like her position outside the investigation gives hes some insight yet unrevealed by this sophomoric recitation of things only visible from her desk at the newsroom.