General Discussion

Emile

(38,833 posts)

177. You prove it and send me a link. I looked many times!

Fri Oct 31, 2025, 01:58 PM

Friday

This is what I find:

Merrick Garland's political party affiliation is not publicly stated, and he is not known to be a registered Democrat or Republican. He is widely considered a moderate and judicial centrist, and his career as a judge has been marked by a reputation for being meticulous and for building consensus. He was appointed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit by President Bill Clinton and later appointed by President Joe Biden to serve as the United States Attorney General.

You said that I prefer a bad faith narrative over fact checking, I will accept your apology.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

182 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sure looks like Garland blew it.... [View all] Takket Oct 30 OP

Has any one checked Garland's bank account during that time period? Irish_Dem Oct 30 #1

you seriously think he was getting paid off for that? LymphocyteLover Oct 30 #7

I seriously think some questions should be asked. Irish_Dem Oct 30 #9

putting responsibility for the downfall of the country all on Garland is total bullshit LymphocyteLover Oct 30 #16

Garland was in charge Chicagogrl1 Oct 30 #17

I am trained as a scientist. You follow the data. Period. Irish_Dem Oct 30 #20

bribery is possible (ie garland) rampartd Oct 30 #21

who bribed him to do this? bigtree Oct 30 #84

Thanks for the facts that too many would Hassler Oct 30 #142

Thank you. Attackers got no defense. No facts. No sources. Just scapegoating and bitching. ancianita Oct 30 #155

Bribery... or blackmail... or threats... Shipwack Oct 30 #96

Completeness?? Puh-lease. For imagination's sake. Bad faith imaginings. ancianita Oct 30 #160

Garland's problem is one that has hurt our party for too long... Trueblue Texan Oct 30 #42

We have been playing by The Marquess of Queensberry Rules 70sEraVet Oct 30 #49

The right wing radicals have been playing by the rules of the abuser and the rapist Stacey Grove Oct 30 #54

Gaslighting is a technique of the abuser. yellow dahlia Oct 30 #150

I'm not sure the problems is PatSeg Oct 30 #108

Perhaps, But When You Know You Are Dealing With... ProfessorGAC Oct 30 #136

This is true PatSeg Oct 30 #146

Seems We're Very Close To The Same Page ProfessorGAC Friday #167

Yes, I think so PatSeg Friday #171

Not the main one. The judiciary hurt the country. AG Garland was the solution, not part of the problem. ancianita Oct 30 #163

Saying Garland was bribed SCantiGOP Oct 30 #97

Saying he was bribed or people defending him? FHRRK Oct 30 #99

What about MTG turning over a new leaf? MorbidButterflyTat Oct 30 #129

"It all depends on who's ox is being gored." vanlassie Oct 30 #159

I'm trained as a scientist and follow the data too. But I must be following different data. LymphocyteLover Oct 30 #111

At the very least, he could have appointed Jack Smith a lot sooner Bluepinky Oct 30 #120

More than two possibilities. PufPuf23 Oct 30 #137

He is the entire reason Mr.WeRP Oct 30 #117

bullshit LymphocyteLover Friday #169

Respectfully disagree Joinfortmill Oct 30 #32

Garland stepped on his dick the whole time the greatest crime in US history was being planned. Irish_Dem Oct 30 #34

Respectfully disagree. Joinfortmill Oct 30 #36

Respectfully Agree. nt yaesu Oct 30 #53

I respectfully agree! Emile Oct 30 #56

Is "stepped on his dick" typical language MorbidButterflyTat Oct 30 #130

Varies between sciences, mr715 Oct 30 #144

So he alone caused the downfall of this country? sheshe2 Oct 30 #154

We would be totally remiss if we did not ask questions. Irish_Dem Oct 30 #13

One question; Why did President Biden stand by him for 4 years? MichMan Oct 30 #29

Until recently Presidents didn't interfere with ongoing investigations Joinfortmill Oct 30 #33

Because he is an institutionalist with "faith" in a broken system; Stacey Grove Oct 30 #51

I agree Scubamatt Oct 30 #81

Biden's presidency was immersed within an actual coup started on Jan 6 Stacey Grove Oct 30 #92

Democratic leadership & the dems in general, CrispyQ Oct 30 #98

Agree Hey Joe Oct 30 #70

I totally disagree that his actions made sense. CrispyQ Oct 30 #86

Nah, he clearly wasn't right for the job. 2021 wasn't the time for a timid "if we do something it's political" bs themaguffin Oct 30 #14

brazil's response to boisonero is the only way to deal with these guys rampartd Oct 30 #23

absolutely themaguffin Oct 30 #114

This isn't a Law & Order episode. You're such a defeatist. Patience, grasshopper. Garland's got this. Scrivener7 Oct 30 #2

OMG Skittles Oct 30 #4

Oh, some still insist they were right all along, and Garland was actually totally speedy and effective. Scrivener7 Oct 30 #5

Exactly. NewHendoLib Oct 30 #12

Media still timidly, and with an abundance of caution, calls Fascists "authoritarians" goddammit. RVN VET71 Oct 30 #31

The media should be hysterical with the nazi fascist language. Like they were with Biden's terrible debate. Clouds Passing Oct 30 #60

It is apparently "very concerning" to the media when an old Liberal shows his age RVN VET71 Oct 30 #107

They formed the Garland Society. BannonsLiver Oct 30 #64

The endless patience lectures was a major red flag. Irish_Dem Oct 30 #15

Might it have been kompromat? yellow dahlia Oct 30 #151

You made me snicker. Solly Mack Oct 30 #18

Sure and hell heard that a lot, just wait we got him. republianmushroom Oct 30 #80

To me, the biggest clue was when Schiff spoke out so forcefully early spooky3 Oct 30 #102

to be fair Skittles Oct 30 #3

And, once again, FUCK YOU MITCH MCCONNELL! Chasstev365 Oct 30 #6

Yep. Garland should be sitting on SCOTUS! CaptainTruth Oct 30 #28

This cannot be said enough! True Dough Oct 30 #40

'Acting on a mix of principle and caution' Joinfortmill Oct 30 #8

And now Trump is demanding indictments, claiming Garland weaponized the Justice Dept Martin Eden Oct 30 #46

Of course. We all saw this - we all knew this Weak Sauce Merrick. NewHendoLib Oct 30 #10

IMHO, being cautious in prosecuting a former POTUS, no matter how guilty they seem, is LymphocyteLover Oct 30 #11

Downvote Ponietz Oct 30 #19

It isn't reasonable when the former POTUS engineered an attempted violent coup to overthrow an election. Crunchy Frog Oct 30 #67

Garland is a republican. Blue Full Moon Oct 30 #22

Or a centrist independent like Cuomo. Emile Oct 30 #57

Back in Texas a half century ago markodochartaigh Oct 30 #125

Wrong. Merrick Garland, born in Chicago, was a Democrat when he was a private citizen in Chicago. ancianita Oct 30 #148

Prove it. ancianita Oct 30 #149

That's the problem, he keeps his political leaning private. Emile Friday #172

YOUR problem. You could look it up like I did and find out. You ancianita Friday #173

You prove it and send me a link. I looked many times! Emile Friday #177

There is plenty of fault to go around democrank Oct 30 #24

Did you see the press conference where Garland calls out Bondi's DOJ for their illegal relationship w the White house? Intractable Oct 30 #25

Why should he? MorbidButterflyTat Oct 30 #131

I agree that Garland should only do what his heart is into. Intractable Oct 30 #133

--and somebody needs a whole book to point this out? 3Hotdogs Oct 30 #26

A lot of DUers here were bashed for the crime of criticizing Merrick Garland. gab13by13 Oct 30 #30

Lest we forget, Eric Holder was also about as useless as my left nut -- no attempt to even investigate 3Hotdogs Oct 30 #119

Some still, apparently, do. Scrivener7 Oct 30 #88

I'm not a scientist, but I had math in grade school, gab13by13 Oct 30 #27

The same thing Obama did, I imagine. Joinfortmill Oct 30 #35

Good point, gab13by13 Oct 30 #41

Garland was one of Obama's poorer choices. comradebillyboy Oct 30 #59

Not certain Obama would agree with your assessment. As far as I can tell Obama has not spoken on the matter. Joinfortmill Oct 30 #62

Which says it all, really. BannonsLiver Oct 30 #72

Ha! Ok. Joinfortmill Oct 30 #75

I don't need Obama's approval to have an opinion. comradebillyboy Oct 30 #104

Ok. Joinfortmill Oct 30 #106

To me RoeVWade Oct 30 #48

Also, didn't Joe have one or two pages. Krasnov had a boat load of boxes. Sorting that out must have been time consuming Joinfortmill Oct 30 #63

I don't expect any President who is multitasking all day, to be the one primarily in charge of where he set down the RoeVWade Oct 30 #124

I believe the only reason Garland got BlueKota Oct 30 #37

Impossible Orrex Oct 30 #38

Amen. republianmushroom Oct 30 #87

Cue the Garland apologists choie Oct 30 #39

there are no Garland apologists bigtree Oct 30 #69

.... BannonsLiver Oct 30 #77

Found one! Orrex Oct 30 #85

This article provides the evidence you pretend iemanja Oct 30 #153

Res ipse loquitur. choie Oct 30 #161

Res ipsa loquitur bigtree Oct 30 #162

This message was self-deleted by its author BannonsLiver Oct 30 #74

With the requisite wall o' words. Scrivener7 Oct 30 #89

I think wall of facts is more accurate. Joinfortmill Oct 30 #105

Yes. I imagine you do. Scrivener7 Oct 30 #109

I do Joinfortmill Oct 30 #118

It's obvious the haters are disrespectful MorbidButterflyTat Oct 30 #132

Words that are proportional to the election interference & massive coup attempt catastrophe by thousands. ancianita Friday #165

And we could have had: AverageOldGuy Oct 30 #43

Bet your bottom dollar he blew it. His inaction will never be overcome. Autumn Oct 30 #44

Garland sandbagged it azureblue Oct 30 #45

I have to admit to getting a twinge of something resembling PTSD when I read this title..... Ol Janx Spirit Oct 30 #47

Joe Biden was one of the greats. Joinfortmill Oct 30 #90

Garland was operating under a long outdated set of rules. Patton French Oct 30 #50

Biden nominated the wrong guy. enough Oct 30 #52

Which was a big mistake. BannonsLiver Oct 30 #91

Those with money/resources/a voice who have or had connections to power Stacey Grove Oct 30 #55

Maybe we should at least put part of the blame on THIS supreme court? bluestarone Oct 30 #58

Much of the Biden administration was apparently very risk-averse. Borogove Oct 30 #61

And we are all now paying the penalty Stacey Grove Oct 30 #65

There has been so many kacekwl Oct 30 #66

this is old and revisionist. Besides, Dilanian is a hack. bigtree Oct 30 #68

There's no amount of cut and paste that's going to salvage his legacy. BannonsLiver Oct 30 #79

That's the cheerleaders' Gish gallop Orrex Oct 30 #93

I'll never understand the fevered devotion. It's utterly bizarre. BannonsLiver Oct 30 #94

There are many, many words here. All the words. Scrivener7 Oct 30 #100

Big men with tears in their eyes said, "Sir, even the best words." Stacey Grove Oct 30 #116

Thank you for this. Very informative... Joinfortmill Oct 30 #103

"Blew it" would imply a good faith effort Queso Delicioso Oct 30 #71

he could have stopped the investigation at any point bigtree Oct 30 #82

You forgot the last step Queso Delicioso Oct 30 #139

This will go down in history as the biggest mistake a Democratic President ever made in appointing a cabinet member. lees1975 Oct 30 #73

I agree. yellow dahlia Oct 30 #156

I wonder how he feels about the DOJ now. Grumpy Old Guy Oct 30 #76

I don't know what Democrats didn't understand about insurrection bucolic_frolic Oct 30 #78

Agreed. yellow dahlia Oct 30 #157

They were scared of the orange convicts shadow. And many are still today. Hotler Oct 30 #83

where were they supposed to be 'scared" of? bigtree Oct 30 #95

Look- a game of "I told you so." Redleg Oct 30 #101

When they found the truck load of secret, classified documents in his bathroom questionseverything Oct 30 #122

You are probably correct. Redleg Oct 30 #123

Seriously! yellow dahlia Oct 30 #158

I'm Not a Garland Fan, But Other Than This Particular Appalling Slow-walk I Think His Record Is Pretty Unimpeachable The Roux Comes First Oct 30 #110

"But other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, what did you think of the show?" Scrivener7 Friday #179

Touche! The Roux Comes First Saturday #180

Democrats had historic, multi-felony charges against their political opponent bigtree Oct 30 #112

Without Garland we never would have Jack Smith. nt in2herbs Oct 30 #113

Didn't Mueller popsdenver Oct 30 #138

Garland as AG is the only person with authority to appoint a special counsel. nt in2herbs Oct 30 #145

One possible fault. moondust Oct 30 #115

"Justice Delayed is Justice Denied" SleeplessinSoCal Oct 30 #121

Without coming down on the pro or anti markodochartaigh Oct 30 #126

The headline misspelled B-I-D-E-N. RockRaven Oct 30 #127

So, what time does Thursday Night Football start? MorbidButterflyTat Oct 30 #128

About as insightful as your other comments. Intractable Oct 30 #134

What position of power does Garland hold now? MineralMan Oct 30 #135

"Those who cannot remember the past, are condemned to repeat it." - George Santayana, The Life of Reason (1905) Celerity Oct 30 #147

"Those who dwell on the past in despair make no progress" - MineralMan, Democratic Underground, 2025 MineralMan Friday #170

Indeed, a wise saying, that those who dwell on the past in despair make no progress... SWBTATTReg Friday #174

He bears partial blame for Trump's being President now iemanja Oct 30 #164

So much for "justice is blind" Layzeebeaver Oct 30 #140

I just had to close my door, I was ranting about this so loudly BigmanPigman Oct 30 #141

Wrong choice! seta1950 Oct 30 #143

We all knew that in 2021 . Garland and Smith were too cautious.... Bread and Circuses Oct 30 #152

How much investigating was needed for the classified documents Sewa Saturday #182

Yup.nt jfz9580m Friday #166

"justice delayed is justice denied" spanone Friday #168

tell it to the judge bigtree Friday #175

That's it! Emile Friday #178

"Acting on a mix of principle and caution ..." TOTAL BULLSHIT Bluetus Friday #176

The biggest national security blunder of my lifetime ecstatic Saturday #181