Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

question everything

(51,857 posts)
Wed Feb 4, 2026, 10:54 AM Wednesday

Comeback Kid' no more: Dems aren't protecting the Clintons from Epstein scrutiny [View all]

Bill and Hillary Clinton are in House Republicans’ crosshairs — and the Democratic Party they once led isn’t coming to the rescue.

A youthful vanguard of progressive office-holders unlikely to even recall the Clinton presidency, let alone defend the former president’s foibles, have largely opted against defending the once formidable pair, even as many regard the GOP effort to compel their testimony blatantly hypocritical and politically driven. Last week, in fact, nine Democratic lawmakers joined Republicans and voted in favor of holding the two-term president in contempt for defying a subpoena to testify as part of the panel’s investigation into the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Just three broke ranks on a similar vote against the former secretary of State.

(snip)

It’s a remarkable rejection of “The Comeback Kid,” who was heartily cheered 18 months ago during the Democratic National Convention, as well as the party’s 2016 presidential nominee, and demonstrates the lack of clout the two have inside the current Democratic Party. The party’s effective abandonment of its longtime standard bearers provides a vivid illustration of how many members are eager to disassociate themselves from the Clinton brand. Both Clintons have said they had no knowledge of Epstein’s crimes and they argue the subpoenas were not tied to a legitimate legislative purpose, rendering them invalid.

(snip)

The Clintons have accused Comer of pursuing partisan antics designed to put them in prison. In a post on X on Monday responding to the Oversight Committee, Clinton spokesperson Angel Ureña wrote that the former president and former secretary of State had “negotiated in good faith” and already “told you under oath what they know, but you don’t care.”

(snip)

Still, several of Clinton’s contemporaries acknowledged a generational shift in loyalties as the political pressure of Comer’s subpoenas grew in recent weeks. “There are fewer people in politics who were there during the Clinton years and during the Clinton revival of the Democratic Party. So there's less loyalty there,” said Bill Daley, who served as Clinton’s secretary of Commerce and acknowledged that the former president’s ties to Epstein “has been a problem … for a number of years.”. That said, Daley didn’t look kindly upon Democrats abiding by constitutional norms at a time when a Republican administration is frequently ignoring them.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/republicans-again-target-clintons-democrats-094500286.html

=========

Many forget that Clinton was the first Democrat to be re-elected since FDR. Should at least consider this

27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I think the Clintons don't want to be part of the circus Easterncedar Wednesday #1
if epstein had anything on clinton that would be out in 2016 rampartd Wednesday #7
And underlined in red, or something! electric_blue68 Thursday #25
I think there might be something else going on here... EarlG Wednesday #2
It only sets a precedent in terms of norms and perception newdeal2 Wednesday #3
I see this story as a nothingburger. Raven123 Wednesday #4
The Clintons will show the nation they are good people. Kid Berwyn Wednesday #5
It's mainly "Teh Deep State" that's going to be in the crosshairs in the upcoming House investigation AZJonnie Wednesday #6
What a bullshit article from politico. The Democrats aren't protecting the Clintons, in fact they were publicly lostincalifornia Wednesday #8
Weird article, like the "research" about the Democratic Party was Wikipedia and their mom or Uncle Stan. betsuni Wednesday #16
Well said betsuni. lostincalifornia Wednesday #17
The Clintons will be fine. Tommy Carcetti Wednesday #9
Trump sounds scared. No more LoCk hEr UP! leftstreet Wednesday #10
Good catch. Reminds me of what he said about Maxwell... Qutzupalotl Wednesday #11
Comeback Kid was a phrase from 1992...that was 34 years ago! Prairie Gates Wednesday #12
Hey, Al Franken got tossed overboard for not actually doing anything, so let the High Standards reign JHB Wednesday #13
Maybe not the younger ones.. Lovie777 Wednesday #14
I don't think Bill and Hillary need protection. comradebillyboy Wednesday #15
The MAGA GOP invited two honey badgers over JCMach1 Wednesday #19
thank you Skittles Thursday #24
Indeed she was not. Even 5 yr olds know... 3catwoman3 Thursday #27
My main lesson from defending Bill the last time was, never again put an individual above the party's AGENDA. UTUSN Wednesday #18
No... lame54 Wednesday #21
Not reframing what I lived. UTUSN Wednesday #22
They need to drop Trump's name as much as possible lame54 Wednesday #20
MaddowBlog-As Clintons prepare to answer questions about Epstein, Trump balks LetMyPeopleVote Thursday #23
The King of Delay JBTaurus83 Thursday #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Comeback Kid' no more: De...