Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

summer_in_TX

(4,400 posts)
33. We Dems (and especially Democratic Socialists) don't truly understand the impact of brainwashing.
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 01:20 AM
Jul 6

Socialists and communists have been feared and maligned for over a hundred years. The Red Scare after WWII never really went away. RW politicians and media have kept it fresh in people's consciousness. Then Hugo Chavez and Nicolás Maduro were very oppressive, making it easy to continue scaring folks with the boogeyman. Not just their Republicans and the RW audience either.

The truth is, the word will never ever get beyond its scary and evil associations. Trying to keep using socialist in any way, shape, or form is a losing proposition. It's a waste of time too.

There are terms that don't have the negative coding, terms that have been used throughout American history, that predate Marxism, socialism, and communism. The common good is a concept from colonial America. It was successfully used in arguments against laissez faire capitalism, when the abuses became apparent. But it isn't incompatible with small business.

Public interest, commonwealth, general well-being are all similar in meaning and history with common good and I rather think would be compatible with what democratic socialists and other dems believe..

I cannot think of any Dems who would oppose the idea of the common good or any of the other terms, nor independents, or quite a few conservatives too. Christians cross the spectrum would tend to find it compatible with the teachings of Jesus, unless they have been infected with the lust for power in which case it likely would be considered woke and weak.

Why, oh why, do democratic socialists persist in clinging to a name that is always effective in damaging us, our party, and our cause? Linking socialist with democrat is poisonous for our reputation. It does nothing to improve the image of socialists for most Americans but does a whole lot to harm the image of democrats.

Cognitive structures build up in brains from repetition, and the repulsion toward anything to do with socialist is already widespread. It has passed from one generation to the next for more than a hundred years. All conservatives have to do is tap into it. It's a tool they already have in their toolbox, and it works.


Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If we're explaining, we're losing. Democratic candidates should just run on Scrivener7 Jul 5 #1
Do you believe those idiots would understand a food bank for pets? MerryBlooms Jul 5 #12
How about we talk about securing Medicare and Medicaid and Social Security and food and housing security, stopping Scrivener7 Jul 5 #15
I'm talking about immediate results though MerryBlooms Jul 5 #18
Thank you Cirsium Jul 5 #19
Exactly. The problem, though, is that the media ALWAYS picks it up and runs with it. We need a message Scrivener7 Jul 5 #20
They're good at name calling. paleotn Jul 5 #25
Trump's little group LilElf70 Jul 5 #27
And seriously... buzzycrumbhunger Jul 5 #2
We need pet food banks, hygiene centers... Dems should be doing this in their town halls in every district MerryBlooms Jul 5 #14
In many places in the United States, that would drop like a stone. I love Mamdani. I don't care what Scrivener7 Jul 5 #21
Soviet Communist Leadership were public sector Oligarchs bucolic_frolic Jul 5 #3
Communism means abolition of private property. Is anyone calling for that? Jeez! dedl67 Jul 5 #4
they might call that "cultural marxism" rampartd Jul 5 #5
Cultural Marxism is a far-right antisemitic conspiracy theory that misrepresents Western Marxism (especially the Celerity Jul 5 #11
yes, of course, but cultural marxism is another fuzzily defined boogie man rampartd Jul 5 #16
To paraphrase Samuel Johnson: "Playing the Communist card is the last refuge of a scoundrel." sop Jul 5 #6
They are gonna bitch about anything we do gay texan Jul 5 #7
Calling democrats names is all they have right now. HappyH Jul 5 #8
Canada, England, Germany, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, etc... GiqueCee Jul 5 #9
No they are not. We (I live in Sweden) in the Nordics have social democracy, not democrat socialism. None of the nations Celerity Jul 5 #17
I too have been trying to point that out to no avail. harumph Jul 5 #23
Why bring facts into the discussion... GJGCA Jul 5 #24
Apologies for the misunderstanding, but... GiqueCee Jul 6 #37
Recommended for Epsteinth time! madinmaryland Jul 5 #10
If they're not socialists Progressive dog Jul 5 #13
Yeah ... see, it's the "restraint" part that the billionaires have a problem with FakeNoose Jul 5 #22
Another Republican scare word dlk Jul 5 #26
Republicans have been calling democrats socialists since the Un-American Activities Committee Blue Full Moon Jul 5 #28
This meme needs to go viral. LilElf70 Jul 5 #29
Trumpers won't see this. They ignorantly believe any lie MAGA tells them especially if it's racist. ChicagoTeamster Jul 5 #30
No one on the left SHOULD be making that claim. Conservatives are dumbasses who don't know the difference and use Karasu Jul 5 #31
That's too complicated for the other side MIButterfly Jul 6 #32
We Dems (and especially Democratic Socialists) don't truly understand the impact of brainwashing. summer_in_TX Jul 6 #33
The biggest political mistake Bernie Sanders ever made is in calling himself a "Democratic Socialist." Intractable Jul 6 #34
If you're explaining and defining... you're losing. QueerDuck Jul 6 #35
I know this. You know this. 30% of the population DenaliDemocrat Jul 6 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»For the Epsteinth Time - ...»Reply #33