From your post the concerned appear to be on your list of opponents, and you've defamed them genericaly. As an educated observer with critical reading skills I find that suspiciously suggesting you aren't a neutral person on the issue. Am I correct??
And I'm NOT ruling out that might be for a very good reason. I did say that the reports had frequency on social media (which means open sharing of content unscrutinized by editors) with only one on Yahoo News.
I never claimed it was true. I only said there are people (mostly on social media, and one very active advocate in Montana) that are claiming data center links to reproductive failures in chickens and cattle.
On a related but very separate issue... I'm quite opposed to the current trend to build all these data centers. THey are exorbitantly expensive and utility demanding. The SUPER RICH behind these projects want to dominate and demand water use and electricity, and shift the cost tof increased utility production to utility rate payers to cover the costs of expanding capacity.
That's mearly a reverse Robin Hood project, rob the poor and give to the rich.
Screw that. If your (a figurative Your) use of electricity and water exceed the capacity of local/regional utilities then You (again figuritaively) damned will need to pay the price to expand utility capacity to serve your business and not local/regional taxpayers
It's the investors need and it should be the investors cost
= new reply since forum marked as read