Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Appeals court allows USPS to move forward with Trump's anti-mail voting order, for now [View all]AZJonnie
(4,338 posts)22. Okay, well, the article has some fairly scary-sounding verbiage in any case
The panel found that USPS had made a strong showing that it is likely to succeed on two arguments: that the NAACPs challenge to the proposed rule is not yet ripe for review, meaning the court may have acted too early, and that the rule likely would not violate the settlement even if finalized.
The appeals court also credited USPS argument that leaving Sullivans injunction in place would prevent the agency from issuing and implementing a final rule before the November 2026 general election
The appeals court also credited USPS argument that leaving Sullivans injunction in place would prevent the agency from issuing and implementing a final rule before the November 2026 general election
I'm no lawyer as I'm sure you are, so if I may inquire with an expert: Is it maybe a mistake to pin all hopes on a victorious 2020 lawsuit by the NAACP regarding a matter that seems fairly distinct from this one in its nature?
Or can that ruling be expected to hold up as cause to block this one?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Appeals court allows USPS to move forward with Trump's anti-mail voting order, for now [View all]
hookaleft
12 hrs ago
OP
Yep, I'm just referring to the current system. Actually, Colorado still does allow in-person voting...
William Seger
6 hrs ago
#49
The states may have to hire third party couriers or legislate some kind of state run courier service. Nt
Fiendish Thingy
11 hrs ago
#15
That's not true for the most part--- only a few states who do ALL mail-in voting
Jack Valentino
9 hrs ago
#41
Courts tend to handle time sensitive election cases quicker than others
Fiendish Thingy
11 hrs ago
#18
They have, but have also ruled against Trump on a number of occasions
Fiendish Thingy
11 hrs ago
#24