Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Appeals court allows USPS to move forward with Trump's anti-mail voting order, for now [View all]LisaL
(48,356 posts)32. States that vote by mail don't even have polling places.
Ballots are also different based on where the person lives (since many elections are local and depend on the person's address).
So none of this is going to work.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Appeals court allows USPS to move forward with Trump's anti-mail voting order, for now [View all]
hookaleft
4 hrs ago
OP
The states may have to hire third party couriers or legislate some kind of state run courier service. Nt
Fiendish Thingy
3 hrs ago
#15
That's not true for the most part--- only a few states who do ALL mail-in voting
Jack Valentino
1 hr ago
#41
Courts tend to handle time sensitive election cases quicker than others
Fiendish Thingy
3 hrs ago
#18