Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Supreme Court fight over birthright citizenship threatens 'chaos' in proving newborns' status [View all]LeftInTX
(34,251 posts)Last edited Sun Mar 29, 2026, 04:16 PM - Edit history (4)
The Constitution is subject to interpretation, but sometimes practicality is a factor in decisions. There is also the question, can the president change a long standing policy via an executive order? If birth right citizenship is to be revoked, wouldn't that be a congressional decision, so that pages and policy can be written. Like, how to determine if the parents have legal standing....
Remember on the Obama Care, decision when Roberts said, "It's a tax".....Literally it wasn't a tax, but practically it was...
I've looked at this case and theoretically, they could just reinterpret the 14th amendment, but it will sure disrupt lives. And numerous policies would need to be written. Parents would need to prove citizenship prior to giving birth. The 14th amendment was designed to grant former slaves citizenship. Likewise, the Hildago treaty several decades early gave Mexican citizens residing in the US, US citizenship by desiginating them as "white".
It also begs the question: "How was citizenship of children of white European immigrants determined prior to the 14th Amendment?" It sounds like it was a bit hodge podge, but people didn't really seem to care.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Wong_Kim_Ark
The constitution makes it clear, that we can no longer ban citizenship based on skin color etc. But it was a supreme court case that allowed a person of Chinese descent be considered a US citizenship. Like Roe v Wade, the case could be overturned. Or the case could be reinterpreted. I don't put anything past the Supreme Court.
There are plenty of countries that do not allow birthright citizenship. India is one of them. There is a huge Bollywood star, born into a prominent film industry family, whose mom is a British citizen. Her dad is an Indian citizen and Bollywood producer. She was born in India. She is a British citizen. and not an Indian citizen. (India does not allow dual citizenship)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alia_Bhatt
Alia Bhatt (/ˈɑːliə ˈbʌt/; born 15 March 1993) is a British actress of Indian descent who predominantly works in Hindi films.[1][2] Known for her portrayals of women in challenging circumstances, she has received several accolades, including a National Film Award and seven Filmfare Awards. She is one of India's highest-paid actresses. Time awarded her with the Time100 Impact Award in 2022 and named her one of the 100 most influential people in the world in 2024.
Born into the Bhatt family, she is a daughter of filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt and actress Soni Razdan.
Bhatt was born into the Bhatt family on 15 March 1993[3][4] in Bombay (known by Mumbai since 1995), Maharashtra, India.[5][6] She is a daughter of Indian filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt and British actress Soni Razdan.[7] Mahesh is of Gujarati descent,[8][9] while Soni is of Kashmiri-Pandit and German descent.[10][11][12] Bhatt holds British citizenship

OK, it's a huge rabbit hole.....
ETA: Mexico does not grant automatic birthright citizenship. I know some US citizens (one may have residential status in Mexico) who did this and they had to go through all sorts of hoops. Baby did become a Mexican citizen, but Mexico had to prove that the parents were US citizens and the US was slow to provide documentation and they also would have been denied if the child would "likely be a charge"....So, they had to prove that they would provide for the child.