Latest Breaking News

LeftInTX

(34,253 posts)

22. They used that arguement last year

Sun Mar 29, 2026, 06:03 PM

Sunday

But even so, the laws enacted by congress [b]should [/b]more or less supercede much of this back and forth......

I didn't know that there was an actual law in 1940, which gave way to how we implement birth right citizenship.

It really should supercede interpretation of the constitutuion because then the Supreme Court would determine that any long standing law written by and implemented by congress for decades is "null and void" via EO.

No one is contesting the constitutionality of the 1940 immigration laws, not even Trump....

He's just obliterating them by defacto...Maybe he isn't even aware of them....

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court fight over birthright citizenship threatens 'chaos' in proving newborns' status [View all] BumRushDaShow Sunday OP

We do not have the "best and the brightest" on our SCOTUS. MLWR Sunday #1

Yeah. Unfortunately... GB_RN Sunday #2

They're trying to enable the crafting of arguments to back up Trump's request. ChicagoTeamster Sunday #4

I know this is simplistic but we are all birthright citizens Srkdqltr Sunday #3

Insanity. This is settled law, even written into our Constitution specifically as an Amendment. Midnight Writer Sunday #5

Excellent comment! WestMichRad Sunday #9

It makes me wonder what is Kavanaugh's real position on this issue? FakeNoose Sunday #6

Damn, that's foul cause Dan Sunday #15

Yes, those are called "anchor babies" and it has been going on for a long time FakeNoose 17 hrs ago #36

I didn't know he asked those questions. It's good that he asked them. LeftInTX Sunday #17

The Confederacy renounced their US citizenship by seceding. All of their descendants lost their birthright citizenship ChicagoTeamster Sunday #7

PLEASE, PLEASE Understand what EOs are and what they are not Bluetus Sunday #8

That is how it is SUPPOSED to work BumRushDaShow Sunday #11

We have to make it more difficult for Roberts Bluetus Sunday #14

We went through that exercise his first term BumRushDaShow Sunday #20

I am perfectly aware we don't control the GOP, the SCOTUS or the legacy media Bluetus Sunday #25

"It is crazy to just sit back and accept this. WE must do our part." BumRushDaShow Yesterday #30

Going down a rabbit hole, I also saw this: LeftInTX Sunday #19

The below is the argument they are apparently going to try to use - BumRushDaShow Sunday #21

They used that arguement last year LeftInTX Sunday #22

As long as the SCOTUS keeps refusing stays on the illegal E.O.s BumRushDaShow Sunday #24

Has the SCOTUS allowed any of the bogus EOs to stand permanently? Bluetus Sunday #26

Remember that we are ONLY just over a year into this term BumRushDaShow Yesterday #31

I'm sure the SCOTUS is all about helping Trump with his agenda Bluetus Yesterday #32

I agree with what you wrote and in particular BumRushDaShow Yesterday #33

Considering that 2700 pages is just a little more than 5 reams of papper. Bluetus 20 hrs ago #35

I seriously doubt, Bayard Sunday #10

"Or any other white baby" .... Would Trump /Roberts bring back the 'one drop' rule of race determination? Norrrm Sunday #27

Easy peasy WestMichRad Sunday #28

If birthright citizenship is dropped Old Crank Sunday #12

As is plainly clear, "What then ?" is not a familiar question to this WH. Shoot first, ask questions later, think never. eppur_se_muova Sunday #13

Donald should prove that he is serious - and there is a way Dan Sunday #16

The Supreme Court fight does not threaten chaos. The administration's suit threatens chaos. Martin68 Sunday #18

Bureaucratic nightmare Mz Pip Sunday #23

Trump's perfect judge... Roland Freisler... original citizenship could be revoked Norrrm Sunday #29

'Alarm bells' ring as Trump resurrects racist arguments in major legal case: experts LetMyPeopleVote 22 hrs ago #34