Latest Breaking News

BumRushDaShow

(169,758 posts)

33. I agree with what you wrote and in particular

Mon Mar 30, 2026, 10:36 AM

Monday

Often, the SCOTUS is able to hang their decisions on holes or inconsistencies left in legislation

But people - mostly actual members of Congress - whine about why legislation is a thousand or more pages. The GOP are the biggest whiners, notably wheeling in carts of printed bills to make some point.

E.g., the loon from Mississippi Marsha Blackburn, posing in front of a printed stack of the ACA and its regs (about 2700 pages) -

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court fight over birthright citizenship threatens 'chaos' in proving newborns' status [View all] BumRushDaShow Sunday OP

We do not have the "best and the brightest" on our SCOTUS. MLWR Sunday #1

Yeah. Unfortunately... GB_RN Sunday #2

They're trying to enable the crafting of arguments to back up Trump's request. ChicagoTeamster Sunday #4

I know this is simplistic but we are all birthright citizens Srkdqltr Sunday #3

Insanity. This is settled law, even written into our Constitution specifically as an Amendment. Midnight Writer Sunday #5

Excellent comment! WestMichRad Sunday #9

It makes me wonder what is Kavanaugh's real position on this issue? FakeNoose Sunday #6

Damn, that's foul cause Dan Sunday #15

Yes, those are called "anchor babies" and it has been going on for a long time FakeNoose Monday #36

I didn't know he asked those questions. It's good that he asked them. LeftInTX Sunday #17

The Confederacy renounced their US citizenship by seceding. All of their descendants lost their birthright citizenship ChicagoTeamster Sunday #7

PLEASE, PLEASE Understand what EOs are and what they are not Bluetus Sunday #8

That is how it is SUPPOSED to work BumRushDaShow Sunday #11

We have to make it more difficult for Roberts Bluetus Sunday #14

We went through that exercise his first term BumRushDaShow Sunday #20

I am perfectly aware we don't control the GOP, the SCOTUS or the legacy media Bluetus Sunday #25

"It is crazy to just sit back and accept this. WE must do our part." BumRushDaShow Monday #30

Going down a rabbit hole, I also saw this: LeftInTX Sunday #19

The below is the argument they are apparently going to try to use - BumRushDaShow Sunday #21

They used that arguement last year LeftInTX Sunday #22

As long as the SCOTUS keeps refusing stays on the illegal E.O.s BumRushDaShow Sunday #24

Has the SCOTUS allowed any of the bogus EOs to stand permanently? Bluetus Sunday #26

Remember that we are ONLY just over a year into this term BumRushDaShow Monday #31

I'm sure the SCOTUS is all about helping Trump with his agenda Bluetus Monday #32

I agree with what you wrote and in particular BumRushDaShow Monday #33

Considering that 2700 pages is just a little more than 5 reams of papper. Bluetus Monday #35

I seriously doubt, Bayard Sunday #10

"Or any other white baby" .... Would Trump /Roberts bring back the 'one drop' rule of race determination? Norrrm Sunday #27

Easy peasy WestMichRad Sunday #28

If birthright citizenship is dropped Old Crank Sunday #12

As is plainly clear, "What then ?" is not a familiar question to this WH. Shoot first, ask questions later, think never. eppur_se_muova Sunday #13

Donald should prove that he is serious - and there is a way Dan Sunday #16

The Supreme Court fight does not threaten chaos. The administration's suit threatens chaos. Martin68 Sunday #18

Bureaucratic nightmare Mz Pip Sunday #23

Trump's perfect judge... Roland Freisler... original citizenship could be revoked Norrrm Sunday #29

'Alarm bells' ring as Trump resurrects racist arguments in major legal case: experts LetMyPeopleVote Monday #34

The man behind Donald Trump's push to end birthright citizenship (suspended attorney John Eastman) LetMyPeopleVote Yesterday #37